Facebook Ads
TikTok Ads
Shopify
At a glanceWe installed Citera v1.1 on the second store, licheni.ro. Compared with v1.0, running on atadesaci.ro, the reported checks improved in four areas: Accessibility from 92 to 100, SEO from 92 to 100, Best Practices from 73 to 92 and Agentic Browsing from 2/3 to 3/3. Performance varies between stores because of catalogues, images and merchant-installed apps, so we do not draw conclusions from one number. Our stated target is Performance 95 or above on mobile and desktop across all important pages. Neither store has reached that overall target yet.
When we launched Citera v1.0 and the first store, atadesaci.ro, the idea was simple: a theme that behaves correctly when measured, rather than promises of "AI visibility". That brought the first client, making it the right time for a second installation and initial improvements.
The second store, licheni.ro, runs version 1.1 of the theme. It has several improvements over v1.0, with differences visible in the figures. Below we compare both stores in PageSpeed Insights, showing the numbers as recorded.
Direct comparison: v1.0 vs v1.1
The figures below come from PageSpeed Insights on real production pages. The metrics and criteria are the same, but the stores, catalogues, images and apps differ. We are examining the observed differences between installations, not ranking the stores.
| Metric | Atadesaci.ro (v1.0) | Licheni.ro (v1.1) |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | 92 mobile, 92 desktop | 100 mobile, 100 desktop |
| SEO | 92 mobile, 92 desktop | 100 mobile, 100 desktop |
| Best Practices | 73 mobile, 73 desktop | 92 mobile, 92 desktop |
| Agentic Browsing | 2 / 3 | 3 / 3 |
| Performance | 96 mobile, 86 desktop | 74 mobile, 88 desktop |
The table presents historical results reported by the agency for two different stores. The differences do not isolate the theme version's effect: catalogue, apps, content and testing conditions differ. A causal conclusion requires a comparison on the same store under documented conditions.
Performance varies. Atadesaci.ro has the higher mobile figure; licheni.ro has the higher desktop figure. It is important to be clear: Performance does not depend only on the theme. Catalogue, image size and count, merchant-installed apps and third-party integrations such as analytics, pop-ups and chat all matter. A good theme provides a starting point. The final figure reflects both theme and store, rather than a pure theme rating.
Agentic Browsing 3/3: why it matters
The "Agentic Browsing" category checks how easily an AI agent β a model-controlled browser acting for a user β can understand, navigate and act on a store. It is an emerging check relevant to Citera's design goals.
The 2/3 and 3/3 results are those reported in the agency's historical checks. Chrome documentation describes Agentic browsing as an informational check of accessibility, stability and WebMCP integration. It is not a ranking score and does not prove a store will be recommended, cited or successfully used by every AI agent.
It is a limited check that helps identify areas for improvement.
What we changed between v1.0 and v1.1
This is not a full developer changelog, but the areas prioritised for the second version:
- Accessibility. Contrast corrections, missing ARIA roles in several CRO components and improved keyboard navigation in drawers and menus.
- SEO. Refactoring several templates to target scores of 100 across important store pages, beyond the homepage and product page.
- Best Practices. Resource handling improvements β correct permissions, modern headers and complete image attributes β to address Lighthouse findings within the theme's control.
- Agentic Browsing. Refinements to semantic HTML and structured data aimed at meeting the category's remaining criterion on product, collection and blog pages.
Each improvement remains in the main codebase. When v1.2 goes live on the third store, it will include these changes alongside what we learn there.
What we have not yet achieved
Our stated target for Citera is simple: Performance of 95 or above on mobile and desktop across all important pages. Neither store has reached that overall target yet. Here is the current historical snapshot:
- Atadesaci.ro (v1.0): 96 mobile, above target; 86 desktop, below target.
- Licheni.ro (v1.1): 74 mobile, below target; 88 desktop, below target.
The source diagnosis differs by store: v1.0 desktop was affected by large images and an imperfect LCP; v1.1 mobile was reported to be affected by the catalogue and integrations. These contributions require profiling and cannot be isolated from this comparison alone. The direction for v1.2 is clear: more work on image optimisation, CRO-section hydration and preloading, plus clearer merchant documentation on controlling the impact of installed apps.
We are not selling one good number from a single store. We are developing a theme with measurable improvements across versions, evaluated against verified data.
Who receives v1.1 and how?
Clients with v1.0 receive migration to v1.1 at no charge, handled by our team. We save existing settings and transfer them to the new version. New clients receive v1.1 on installation.
Support remains in Romanian, with documentation updated for the version. If you sell in Romania on Shopify and want clear information for both Google and AI systems, contact us to test it. Write to info@allsoftagency.ro and we will show how v1.1 could work for your store.
We install the theme, configure it to your brief and set up its AI information features: JSON-LD, llms.txt / agents.md, IndexNow and metafields. Write to info@allsoftagency.ro or 0756 247 611 and we will reply within 24 hours.
Request a Citera v1.1 demo βFrequently asked questions
Why does Performance vary so much between the two stores?
What does "Agentic Browsing 3/3" mean in practice?
I have v1.0 installed. What should I do?
When will Performance reach 95 on both device types?
Can I see both stores in production?
Figure source: PageSpeed Insights, direct measurements on atadesaci.ro (Citera v1.0) and licheni.ro (Citera v1.1), checked by the operator. PageSpeed figures can vary between runs with network load, caching and factors outside the theme. For full theme context, see the launch article Citera: a Shopify theme designed for AI visibility.